--- a/src/mikraite/In_Defense_of_Feminism.html	Sat Sep 13 18:09:47 2025 -0600
+++ b/src/mikraite/In_Defense_of_Feminism.html	Sat Sep 13 18:25:54 2025 -0600
@@ -12,9 +12,9 @@
 
 <p>Here I will defend feminism, but not for the typical reasons.  In order to understand this post, you must understand these two previous posts of mine:</p>
 
-<p><a href="/mikraite/Human_Evolution.html">Human Evolution</a> where I explain why women in feminist cultures are attracted to stupid immoral men.</p>
+<p><a href="Human_Evolution.html">Human Evolution</a> where I explain why women in feminist cultures are attracted to stupid immoral men.</p>
 
-<p><a href="http://mikraite.arkian.net/The-Rise-and-Fall-of-Christian-Culture-tp102.html">The Rise and Fall of Christian Culture</a> where I explain how American Christianity failed in the 1800s, meaning lost the ability to impose morality.</p>
+<p><a href="The_Rise_and_Fall_of_Christian_Culture.html">The Rise and Fall of Christian Culture</a> where I explain how American Christianity failed in the 1800s, meaning lost the ability to impose morality.</p>
 
 <p>In the "Human Evolution" post I explained that women simply choose the type of man who is evolutionarily optimal in the current environment.  Let me take this one step further.  Probably the most important thing for a woman is which men she has sex with, because this will determine the future success of her genes.  Because this is so important, one can reasonably assume that a significant part of a woman's brain is dedicated to this issue.  This means that women can intuitively determine which men are genetically "good" much better than men can using analytical reasoning.  In other words, men have no right to doubt women's mating choices in terms of genetic suitability.  When a woman says that a man is "hot", she is unquestionably correct that he is a good genetic choice in her current environment.  And when a woman says that a man is a (genetic) loser, she is also unquestionably correct in her current environment.</p>