Mercurial Hosting > go2
comparison src/NoAlt.html @ 0:0e911cd3fd2a
add content
| author | Franklin Schmidt <fschmidt@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| date | Sun, 02 Apr 2023 10:30:03 -0600 |
| parents | |
| children |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
| -1:000000000000 | 0:0e911cd3fd2a |
|---|---|
| 1 <html> | |
| 2 | |
| 3 <!-- Mirrored from users.eniinternet.com/bradleym/NoAlt.html by HTTrack Website Copier/3.x [XR&CO'2014], Sun, 06 Nov 2022 06:49:33 GMT --> | |
| 4 <head> | |
| 5 <title></title> | |
| 6 </head> | |
| 7 <body text="#000000" link="#0000ff" vlink="#551a8b" alink="#ff0000" bgcolor="#c0c0c0"> | |
| 8 <a name="There Is No Satisfactory Alternative T"> | |
| 9 <p><strong><hr> | |
| 10 </strong> | |
| 11 <br wp="br1"><br wp="br2"> | |
| 12 <p><strong>There Is No Satisfactory Alternative To Go</strong> | |
| 13 | |
| 14 <p><strong>© 2002 Milton N. Bradley</a></strong> | |
| 15 | |
| 16 <p>As one of the world's great strategic board games, Chess shares certain important characteristics | |
| 17 with Go that also makes it a valuable pedagogical adjunct to the standard curriculum, and it has | |
| 18 often been used in that role outside the Orient in places where Go was unknown. As Shelby | |
| 19 Lyman noted in his nationally syndicated Chess column in Long Island's premiere newspaper | |
| 20 Newsday on Sept 10, 1991, "Chess works in an educational environment because ......it is a | |
| 21 sport....and it is played for fun." He continued "... children playing Chess engage their full | |
| 22 intellect, will and strength to a remarkable extent. They alertly attend the chessboard: observing, | |
| 23 remembering, generating ideas, testing those ideas, making decisions and mistakes and learning | |
| 24 from those mistakes." He concluded "Chess has an advantage over most school subjects: it | |
| 25 combines both theory and practice. Ideas are honed and tested in the crucible of competitive play. | |
| 26 Poor formulation or poor execution of ideas loses games. Careless, faulty thinking is ruthlessly | |
| 27 refuted on the chessboard." | |
| 28 | |
| 29 <p>The validity of Lyman's contention that Chess can improve student performance was recently | |
| 30 abundantly demonstrated in New York City's Mott Hall School, as reported by Brent Staples in | |
| 31 the Sunday New York Times of Dec 15, 2002, and described in considerable detail in the section | |
| 32 of this web page entitled "Teaching The New 'R' Of Reasoning". | |
| 33 | |
| 34 <p><em><strong>Go is far superior to Chess as a pedagogical tool because it not only fully shares <u>all</u> of these | |
| 35 considerable assets, but also possesses several others of transcendent importance that <u>Chess | |
| 36 lacks almost completely</u>:</strong></em> | |
| 37 | |
| 38 <p><UL type = disc> | |
| 39 | |
| 40 <p><LI> Most readily apparent is Go's far greater accessibility, especially by the very young. It is | |
| 41 free of all the artificial complexities (e.g. different piece moves, promotion, castling, en passant | |
| 42 capture, etc.) that beset Chess. The structure of Go is as simple and almost as easy to learn in | |
| 43 rudimentary fashion as Checkers, so it is possible for almost anyone to quickly and effortlessly | |
| 44 begin playing it. | |
| 45 | |
| 46 <p><LI> The rigid starting setup of Chess vastly reduces the number of options available, thereby | |
| 47 inhibiting the free flow of the player's imagination. In contrast, <em>the Go board starts empty and | |
| 48 the players create their own unique structure in every game, thus allowing full reign to their | |
| 49 creativity and imagination.</em> | |
| 50 | |
| 51 <p><LI> The simplistic objective of Chess of catching the opposing King together with its small 8 x | |
| 52 8 square scale and constricting starting lineup lead to a "quick kill" mentality in which the | |
| 53 capture of some material or a successful "mating attack" on the opposing King can lead to an | |
| 54 instant win. The result is a game that is very strongly biased toward the tactical, with very little | |
| 55 opportunity for the development of much more than elemental strategy. In contrast, the 19 x 19 | |
| 56 line Go board has enormous scale. Coupled with the need to trade off short term profits and their | |
| 57 costs against the possibility of later achieving greater long term gain, this leads to incredibly | |
| 58 profound strategy whose realization depends upon the precise execution of tactics every bit as | |
| 59 incisive as those of Chess. <em><strong>This gives Go an entire dimension for intellectual development | |
| 60 almost entirely lacking in Chess.</em></strong> | |
| 61 | |
| 62 <p><LI> Perhaps most important of all, the vast scale of the Go board makes it impossible to | |
| 63 precisely calculate anticipated outcomes during the crucial opening stages of the game, and this | |
| 64 requires the players to rely entirely upon general strategic principles and such right brain | |
| 65 functions as pattern recognition and "instinct". <em><strong>This integration of right and left brain function | |
| 66 provided by Go is crucial to the complete development of the brain, and is also almost | |
| 67 completely lacking in Chess (or any other known human activity).</em></strong> | |
| 68 | |
| 69 <p>This unique integration of left and right brain function in playing Go was recently directly | |
| 70 demonstrated for the first time by MRI brain scans, in experiments described in the report | |
| 71 referenced in the section of this web page "Comparison Between Chess and Go". | |
| 72 | |
| 73 <p></UL> | |
| 74 | |
| 75 <p>For these reasons, <em><strong>Go</em> not only provides <em>unlimited scope</em> for even the most brilliant to | |
| 76 exercise their mental capabilities to the fullest, but <em>an effectiveness in improving the brain | |
| 77 function and academic performance of even underachievers unmatched by any other known | |
| 78 pedagogical mechanism.</em></strong> | |
| 79 <a name="Caveats "></a> | |
| 80 <p><u><strong>Caveats</u></strong> | |
| 81 | |
| 82 <p>There are some significant caveats that must be addressed in implementing a school Go program, | |
| 83 especially in the US: | |
| 84 | |
| 85 <p><UL type = disc> | |
| 86 | |
| 87 <p><LI> Most important is the realization that <em>Go is not a form of magic wand</em>, despite the | |
| 88 enormous benefits that its participants ultimately enjoy. Mere brief exposure to the elegant basic | |
| 89 concepts of Go and occasional casual play may be pleasurable, but will <u>not</u> result in substantive | |
| 90 salutary changes in the student's thinking processes or study habits! | |
| 91 | |
| 92 <p><em><strong>The benefits Go provides can <u>only</u> be achieved over a period of months and years during | |
| 93 which the student actively studies and plays Go, and progresses well into the advanced stages | |
| 94 of skill.</em> </strong>The reason is that a deep understanding of and ability to appropriately address the | |
| 95 complex interactions between Go's strategy, tactics, and elegant structural concepts are what | |
| 96 actually improve the student's intellectual capabilities. Coupled with Go's subtle development | |
| 97 and inculcation of improved study habits, this then translates into improved academic | |
| 98 performance. | |
| 99 | |
| 100 <p><LI> It is this "rewiring" of the brain to enable it to efficiently engage in the kind of <em> advanced | |
| 101 REASONING</em> essential to both playing Go and solving real world problems that is most readily | |
| 102 accomplished at about age 4 or 5. As noted in some detail in the section of this web page | |
| 103 "Teaching The New 'R' Of Reasoning", the ideal learning method for such young children is | |
| 104 largely but not wholly informal, supplemented by a small irreducible minimum of formal | |
| 105 instruction. Unfortunately, the ideal combination of conditions to permit using this preferred | |
| 106 method does not routinely exist anywhere in the US today outside a very few Oriental | |
| 107 communities. Therefore there is no practical alternative to a more formal, intrinsically less | |
| 108 desirable (but still effective) approach. | |
| 109 | |
| 110 <p><LI> In Japan, Go is a well established and highly respected cultural/social activity and almost | |
| 111 every child is already aware of its existence long before entering school, so participation in an in-school Go program is fairly readily obtained and accepted. In the US Go is almost completely | |
| 112 unknown to all but a few students of Oriental extraction. Far worse, in our basically anti-intellectual society, activities like playing Go are also often characterized by many students and | |
| 113 parents as "nerdy", and are viewed disapprovingly. Overcoming this erroneous negative | |
| 114 preconception may constitute a formidable challenge, at least until the program is well | |
| 115 established and its value demonstrated beyond question. | |
| 116 | |
| 117 <p></UL> | |
| 118 | |
| 119 <p><a href="SHUNTGO.html"><Font Color="#0033FF"><strong>Continue</strong></Font></a> | |
| 120 | |
| 121 <p>Click Here To Return To<a href="index.html"><Font Color="#0033FF"><strong> Milt's Go | |
| 122 Page</strong></Font></a> | |
| 123 | |
| 124 <p><hr> | |
| 125 | |
| 126 <br wp="br1"><br wp="br2"> | |
| 127 </body> | |
| 128 | |
| 129 <!-- Mirrored from users.eniinternet.com/bradleym/NoAlt.html by HTTrack Website Copier/3.x [XR&CO'2014], Sun, 06 Nov 2022 06:49:33 GMT --> | |
| 130 </html> |
