Mercurial Hosting > reactionary
changeset 72:8bd99d5f468e
remove scum
author | Franklin Schmidt <fschmidt@gmail.com> |
---|---|
date | Mon, 24 Mar 2025 18:50:48 -0600 |
parents | 3ac9896d9983 |
children | 20e080f6d217 |
files | src/about.html.luan src/freedit.html.luan src/hg_dev.html.luan src/learn.html.luan |
diffstat | 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) [+] |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/src/about.html.luan Wed Jan 22 02:13:39 2025 -0700 +++ b/src/about.html.luan Mon Mar 24 18:50:48 2025 -0600 @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ <p>The story of Greek science begins with <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagoras">Pythagoras</a> who lived in the 500s BC. He was the first person to recognize the power of math to describe the world and he applied math to many things. This inspired Greek astronomers to try to describe cosmology in simple mathematical terms. This was during the time that Greeks were a rising culture. They were highly intelligent people who respected reality.</p> - <p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plato">Plato</a> lived in the 300s BC by which time Greece was in decline. This decline was very well described in the comedies of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristophanes">Aristophanes</a>. The decline sounds much like all declining cultures in history including our own, and is presumably the result of decaying culture and decaying genetics. In other words, the Greeks were becoming moronic scum, just as members of modern western culture are today. Plato was an ideologue who was in love with his own ideas and had no interest in reality. Plato insisted on a <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geocentric_model">geocentric model</a> of cosmology based purely on circles. Why? Just because this was the idea that appealed to him. Reality was irrelevant. Aristotle backed him up, and so this became orthodoxy. By the time Aristarchus came along with his heliocentric cosmology, he was violating orthodox ideas so the moronic scum of his time just ignored him. Then in the 100s BC Ptolemy created <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geocentric_model#Ptolemaic_system">a horrible overcomplicated geocentric model</a> based on the circles that Plato required. This became the standard for the next 1700 years.</p> + <p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plato">Plato</a> lived in the 300s BC by which time Greece was in decline. This decline was very well described in the comedies of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristophanes">Aristophanes</a>. The decline sounds much like all declining cultures in history including our own, and is presumably the result of decaying culture and decaying genetics. In other words, the Greeks were becoming stupid and evil, just as members of modern western culture are today. Plato was an ideologue who was in love with his own ideas and had no interest in reality. Plato insisted on a <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geocentric_model">geocentric model</a> of cosmology based purely on circles. Why? Just because this was the idea that appealed to him. Reality was irrelevant. Aristotle backed him up, and so this became orthodoxy. By the time Aristarchus came along with his heliocentric cosmology, he was violating orthodox ideas so the depraved people of his time just ignored him. Then in the 100s BC Ptolemy created <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geocentric_model#Ptolemaic_system">a horrible overcomplicated geocentric model</a> based on the circles that Plato required. This became the standard for the next 1700 years.</p> <p>Cosmology only changed again when <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicolaus_Copernicus">Copernicus</a> revived the ideas of Aristarchus. Why did it take to long? Because humanity had become just too stupid to appreciate good ideas. They weren't completely retarded. Ptolemy's horrible system did require some intelligence to create. And the Romans managed to do engineering and build an empire while completely failing to contribute anything to science or math or have any fundamental insights into the world. There are levels of intelligence, and Ancient Greeks and recent Europeans were at the top level. The Romans were at the next level. And most of history was composed of people too stupid to do engineering or much of anything.</p>
--- a/src/freedit.html.luan Wed Jan 22 02:13:39 2025 -0700 +++ b/src/freedit.html.luan Mon Mar 24 18:50:48 2025 -0600 @@ -27,13 +27,13 @@ <p>The idea of FreedIt is to be a distributed free-speech alternative to Reddit. Unlike everything else described on this site, the users of FreedIt would not be programmers but would rather be regular people, most likely from mainstream culture. So to explain the market for FreedIt, I must first explain some cultural and political issues.</p> - <p>All members of modern culture, without exception, are scum - purely vile and evil, devoid of any redeeming qualities. For convenience, I will simply refer to these people as "modern scum". If any modern scum are programmers, then they will naturally be modern programmers, and so this Reactionary Software website is not targeted at them. All reactionary programmers will be from outside of modern culture, so this site generally doesn't have to concern itself with modern scum. But in the case of a general-use program like FreedIt, I must consider the mass market.</p> + <p>All members of modern culture, without exception, are purely vile and evil, devoid of any redeeming qualities. For convenience, I will simply refer to these people as "modern culture people". If any modern culture people are programmers, then they will naturally be modern programmers, and so this Reactionary Software website is not targeted at them. All reactionary programmers will be from outside of modern culture, so this site generally doesn't have to concern itself with modern culture people. But in the case of a general-use program like FreedIt, I must consider the mass market.</p> - <p>Free speech, being a virtue, holds no fundamental appeal for modern scum. But modern scum have a long-standing civil war between its Left and its Right. Whichever is in power suppresses the speech of the other side. Whichever is out of power supports free speech only out of self-interest. When the Right was in power, the Left supported free speech. Now the Left is in power, so the Right supports free speech.</p> + <p>Free speech, being a virtue, holds no fundamental appeal for modern culture. But modern culture has a long-standing civil war between its Left and its Right. Whichever is in power suppresses the speech of the other side. Whichever is out of power supports free speech only out of self-interest. When the Right was in power, the Left supported free speech. Now the Left is in power, so the Right supports free speech.</p> - <p>Among modern scum, the only intelligent people are the sociopathic global elite. Everyone else are morons. The elite are currently aligned with the Left, which means that there are no intelligent people on the Right. And this means that there is no one on the Right who can effectively get things done. So the big websites are controlled by the Left. The Right would like to create alternatives, but they are just too stupid to do so.</p> + <p>Among modern culture people, the only intelligent people are the sociopathic global elite. Everyone else are morons. The elite are currently aligned with the Left, which means that there are no intelligent people on the Right. And this means that there is no one on the Right who can effectively get things done. So the big websites are controlled by the Left. The Right would like to create alternatives, but they are just too stupid to do so.</p> - <p>So now I can explain the market. Effectively the market for FreedIt is the Right-wing of modern scum who have no tolerable alternative to Reddit where they can post freely. All existing alternatives that I know of don't fully have free speech, so some elements of the Right can't speak freely. And all alternatives are technically just garbage, barely even usable. So FreedIt, as a technically sound fully free speech alternative, should be able to dominate the market of the Right.</p> + <p>So now I can explain the market. Effectively the market for FreedIt is the Right-wing of modern culture people who have no tolerable alternative to Reddit where they can post freely. All existing alternatives that I know of don't fully have free speech, so some elements of the Right can't speak freely. And all alternatives are technically just garbage, barely even usable. So FreedIt, as a technically sound fully free speech alternative, should be able to dominate the market of the Right.</p> <p>There is one other issue that should be addressed. While the Left is mostly a uniform herd of morons, the Right does contain divisions. The extremist Right offends the moderate Right. This must be addressed to appeal to all parties. I posted a solution to this issue <a href="https://saidit.net/s/nonmorons/comments/8hnj/free_speech_and_offensive_content/">here</a>.</p>
--- a/src/hg_dev.html.luan Wed Jan 22 02:13:39 2025 -0700 +++ b/src/hg_dev.html.luan Mon Mar 24 18:50:48 2025 -0600 @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ <div content> <h1>Mercurial Development</h1> - <p><a href="mercurial.html">Mercurial</a> seems okay, but I have an older version. Are the newer versions still okay? It would be worth having someone involved with Mercurial to make sure that modern scum don't ruin it.</p> + <p><a href="mercurial.html">Mercurial</a> seems okay, but I have an older version. Are the newer versions still okay? It would be worth having someone involved with Mercurial to make sure that modern culture programmers don't ruin it.</p> <p>I can think of at least one extension worth adding. This would be to replace <a href="https://hg.reactionary.software/">my hosting solution</a> with an extension. Hosting should be available to everyone, and then I wouldn't need to maintain my hosting solution.</p>
--- a/src/learn.html.luan Wed Jan 22 02:13:39 2025 -0700 +++ b/src/learn.html.luan Mon Mar 24 18:50:48 2025 -0600 @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ title = [[Introduction]] content = function() %> -<p>Learning reactionary programming will give you a deep understanding of programming and will enable to you to write your own programs and websites. However this is not enough to get a job with modern scum (members of depraved modern culture). Modern scum will expect you to use tools popular with them, so you would have to learn one of those. Probably the least horrible programming tool used by modern scum is <a href="python.html">Python</a>, so I would recommend learning that if you want a job.</p> +<p>Learning reactionary programming will give you a deep understanding of programming and will enable to you to write your own programs and websites. However this is not enough to get a job in depraved modern culture. Modern culture will expect you to use tools popular with them, so you would have to learn one of those. Probably the least horrible programming tool used by modern culture is <a href="python.html">Python</a>, so I would recommend learning that if you want a job.</p> <p>The next 4 lessons are basic computer literacy. Even if you are not interested in programming, these would be useful skills.</p> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ title = [[Text Editor and JSON]] content = function() %> -<p>A text editor is a basic tool for reactionary programmers. We use simple flexible tools. Modern scum use an <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integrated_development_environment">IDE</a> which is big, <a href="https://mikraite.arkian.net/Changed-my-mind-about-IDE-s-tp2769.html">complicated</a>, and inflexible. We don't use such tools.</p> +<p>A text editor is a basic tool for reactionary programmers. We use simple flexible tools. Modern culture uses an <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integrated_development_environment">IDE</a> which is big, <a href="https://mikraite.arkian.net/Changed-my-mind-about-IDE-s-tp2769.html">complicated</a>, and inflexible. We don't use such tools.</p> <p>I reviewed the available text editors and I think <a href="https://www.sublimetext.com/">Sublime Text</a> is the best one available. So please download it and learn how it works.</p> @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ %> <p>Google Chrome is the standard client-side web development tool. So the first step is to make sure that you have Chrome installed and running.</p> -<p>Using Chrome, on any page you can right-click in an empty area and from the menu select "View Page Source". This will show you the HTML for the webpage. If you try this on different websites, you will probably notice that my webpages are fairly short and well organized while the webpages of modern scum are unreadable. Another thing to try is to right-click anywhere in a page and select "Inspect". This should open the developer tools with the tab "Elements" selected. In this tab, you get the HTML organized as a tree that can be expanded to collapsed. The "Elements" tab of Chrome developer tools will be your core tool when you work with HTML and CSS. You should play with it and do your own research on it to learn how it works.</p> +<p>Using Chrome, on any page you can right-click in an empty area and from the menu select "View Page Source". This will show you the HTML for the webpage. If you try this on different websites, you will probably notice that my webpages are fairly short and well organized while the webpages of modern culture are unreadable. Another thing to try is to right-click anywhere in a page and select "Inspect". This should open the developer tools with the tab "Elements" selected. In this tab, you get the HTML organized as a tree that can be expanded to collapsed. The "Elements" tab of Chrome developer tools will be your core tool when you work with HTML and CSS. You should play with it and do your own research on it to learn how it works.</p> <p>The next step is to download this website like this:</p> @@ -216,9 +216,9 @@ <p>I left out resources for HTML itself. You should just look up HTML tags with Google or ChatGPT as you encounter them. That is good enough to learn HTML.</p> -<p>Ideally one should be able to look at web pages around the internet to learn. But unfortunately they are mostly overcomplicated crap that is very difficult to understand. You can try. My personal websites are like this one - very simple, so they don't look professional to modern scum. I can't link to my best commercial website because that would ruin its reputation (because I am infamous). But I can link to some of my old commercial websites <a href="http://test.tleggings.com/">here</a> and <a href="http://test.super-resume.com/">here</a>. These have reasonable HTML and CSS.</p> +<p>Ideally one should be able to look at web pages around the internet to learn. But unfortunately they are mostly overcomplicated crap that is very difficult to understand. You can try. My personal websites are like this one - very simple, so they don't look professional to modern culture. I can't link to my best commercial website because that would ruin its reputation (because I am infamous). But I can link to some of my old commercial websites <a href="http://test.tleggings.com/">here</a> and <a href="http://test.super-resume.com/">here</a>. These have reasonable HTML and CSS.</p> -<p>I have a few general principles for working with HTML and CSS. First, modern scum claim that HTML is for content and CSS is for styling. This is nonsense. Both HTML and CSS are for layout, don't think of them as being conceptually different. Just use both in the simplest possible way to get the results you want. Don't bother with the useless new HTML5 content tags like <code>header</code>. Just use <code>div</code> and <code>span</code> for most things. Also I use HTML attributes as selectors, not HTML classes. This is just simpler. HTML classes are useless, leave them for modern scum.</p> +<p>I have a few general principles for working with HTML and CSS. First, modern culture claims that HTML is for content and CSS is for styling. This is nonsense. Both HTML and CSS are for layout, don't think of them as being conceptually different. Just use both in the simplest possible way to get the results you want. Don't bother with the useless new HTML5 content tags like <code>header</code>. Just use <code>div</code> and <code>span</code> for most things. Also I use HTML attributes as selectors, not HTML classes. This is just simpler. HTML classes are useless, leave them for modern culture.</p> <p>You will need HTML, CSS, Javascript, and Luan to make a website. So I suggest that you get a basic understanding of each of these and then go back later to study them in greater depth.</p> <%